hi @JQsentcae, The aim of the forum is to help you learn how to solve these problems. That is… “teach you to fish” so to speak, rather than just throw you the whole fish. After Jeremy provided tour answer, you don’t report any follow up research. Something like these searches…
If you still unable to make it work, report what you’ve learnt, which will help you ask more targeted questions. It would be nice to hear you managed to sort it out yourself.
Perhaps try: !ls -F {path}
to confirm what files ended up on disk
It worked great!!! Thank you!!
If you don’t have one already, create a ‘requirements.txt’ file in your root folder, then write ‘fastai’ in the document. Once you’ve pushed your changes to huggingface you should have access to fastai.
It works thank you
Where is says…
Have you done that?
If you can’t work this out yourself, its discussed somewhere in the live coding videos.
(note: You’ll gain a lot watching the whole series)
It’s also discussed in the HF Spaces tutorial linked in the topic and discussed in the lesson.
@ilovescience has a wonderful blog post on how exactly to go from a FastAI model to a published Gradio + HuggingFace demo:
Essentially the export.pkl file is too large to use git, so you install git lfs to track it:
git lfs install
git lfs track "*.pkl"
git add .gitattributes
git commit -m "update .gitattributes so git lfs will track .pkl files"
Then just commit and push normally
About the description about ResizeMethod…
I am a bit confused by the following description in the content of L2:
All of these approaches seem somewhat wasteful, or problematic. If we squish or stretch the images they end up as unrealistic shapes, leading to a model that learns that things look different to how they actually are, which we would expect to result in lower accuracy. If we crop the images then we remove some of the features that allow us to perform recognition…
In my understanding, can’t we just regard those “crop/squish/pad” methods as kind of “augmentation”? How could they be wasteful or problematic?
Welcome to the forum @hiankun!
I believe the answer is within the quote itself.
—> problematic
—> wasteful
Or have I not understood your question correctly?
I am afraid that it’s me keeping misunderstanding the original context, but let me try to elaborate my question again. 
When we apply augmentation techniques, the images are often “squished” and even “distorted”, therefore I don’t see why the “squishing” operation will cause any problems.
Similarly, “cropping” is also a common augmentation technique. How could it is okay for augmentation but is wasteful when we apply ResizeMethod?
I think the statement should be viewed in the context of ‘Resize’ vs ‘RandomResizedCrop’. Jeremy is saying that randomly cropping a different part of an image is better than cropping the same part every epoch since the model will get to see different parts of the image.
It is also better than squishing the original image since squishing changes the aspect ratio. Hope this helps?
Thank you for the context part. Can I say that “cropping out different parts” is a better strategy than “just cropping the center part” in the sense of utilizing the original images?
For the squishing part, my understanding now is as the following (FYI and welcome any suggestions or corrections):
I never expect that I would have to think such basic concepts again after training many models. That’s great to revisit and to clarify these stuff.
Even although it’s common for augmentation, it still has problems. Hopefully from the description you quoted, you can see that it has downsides, and you can think about how to best mitigate these downsides when thinking about how to augment your data.
in the video for this lesson Jeremy said he will share the version of the notebook using ddg instead of bing image search. I can’t see a link to it within this topic. does anyone know if it is available? thanks
DDG is used in these.
In the course repo.
Or Kaggle if you prefer.
By the way: Yuqi’s code (Lesson 2 official topic - #335 by Yuqi) solved a bug in my HF app. Turns out I couldn’t just use my original ‘categories’ list from generating & saving a learner, when I reload it. I needed to do just what Yuqi did and use its “learn.dls.vocab” list instead. Maybe fast.ai alphabetizes the categories?
I created an image classifier that takes in 3 labels, but doesn’t recognize when the input is none of the labels. did I miss a section in the lesson where this is addressed?
link: Nyc Iconic Building Classifier - a Hugging Face Space by jvrbntz
