Is there an Arxiv link for this paper? Arxiv-sanity only pulls in Arxiv papers. My assumption (based on searching) is that it’s not.
The NIPS-2013 submission also has a supplemental which discusses hp@k:
https://papers.nips.cc/paper/5204-devise-a-deep-visual-semantic-embedding-model
The supplement has implementation details as well.
Edit: This supplement is after the references at the end of the paper. (I did not scroll that far down…)
No it’s not on Arxiv AFAIK. But there’s a followup work that is, so you can use that for finding related: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5650
Thank you!
@davecg @kelvin Did either of you successfully implement the DEVISE paper? If so, can I look over your shoulder one day at your code to understand how you did it?
It’s implemented in this notebook: imagenet_process.ipynb
Have you looked through this yet?
Sadly don’t have the hardware setup to run that notebook correctly. Amazon P2 cracks out on even the smaller LSUN dataset for me, much less ImageNet. I meant - have you been able to run this on all of ImageNet? Know that you two have downloaded it to your boxes.
You don’t need the full dataset. You can use the subset of Imagenet that Jeremy posted. It won’t be as accurate but you’ll see how the model works and the results are good enough to illustrate the effect. That dataset should work on a P2.
Per Jeremy’s post today on accuracy - Imagenet accuracy is fine down to about 50% of the dataset, then drops off rapidly - plus seemed like the nature of the classifications changed with more epochs (classified fish in nets, then after more epochs classified the specific species of fish). Wanted to poke at a model trained on full ImageNet data to see other quirks & capabilities.
I was in the middle of training it on all of Imagenet. However I looked at how much time tqdm projected, then looked at all the other things I wanted to get done, and I promptly killed it and trained the model on a sample.
LOL, Amazon was taking forever with wgan so I killed it too. Sigh, scarce GPU resources is such a first world problem 
I ran WGAN for 12h then killed it. Then noticed Jeremy had also killed his WGAN training at some point. It still generated decent images though.
Couldn’t train mine enough to the point where it generated reasonable looking digits. Kept oscillating between very bad and sorta better, not really converging towards better results.