The plot method defined in utils.py switches it back to RGB.
My favourite Python library for plotting is Plotly.
Allows you create great interactive plots in various formats, extremely quickly and easily. They do offer cloud options for easier sharing, I find the iPython notebook intergration brilliant.
if (ims.shape[-1] != 3):
ims = ims.transpose((0,2,3,1))
Did anyone run into this error with initializations
ImportError: cannot import name 'initializations' ---> 21 from keras import initializations 22 from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50, decode_predictions, conv_block, identity_block 23 from keras.applications.vgg16 import VGG16
I can’t find initializations in keras documentation either. I see initializers but not initializations.
Is it possible to copy models or layers in Keras. For example in lesson 3 instead of defining a completely new model with the batchnorm layers included it would be nice if we could just do:
bn =  for layer in model.layers: if type(layer) is Dropout: bn.append(Dropout(.5)) bn.append(BatchNormalization()) else: bn.append(layer) model = Sequential(bn)
If I do this then the model.summary() has extra connected_to layers. For example:
convolution2d_209 (Convolution2D (None, 64, 224, 224) 1792 zeropadding2d_209 zeropadding2d_209
I can fit the model like this but what are practical implications? Is it fitting what I want or adding in extra nodes?
You can use copy_layer, copy_layers, copy_weights, and copy_model from utils.py. See the source to see how they work.
Does np_utils.to_categorical have the same result as OneHot Encoding?
I implemented DenseNet for a small data set that I have. In the reference implementation they used np_utils.to_categorical on CIFAR10 dataset to convert the labels to binary. I felt that with our OneHot encoding mechanism we achieved the same thing but would like to get expert opinion.
Its hard to tell since both return a 2 dimensional array with 1s and 0s.
I believe so - check the source to be sure though.
The code is different but the intent seems to be the same in to_categorical:
y = np.array(y, dtype=‘int’).ravel()
if not num_classes:
num_classes = np.max(y) + 1
n = y.shape
categorical = np.zeros((n, num_classes))
categorical[np.arange(n), y] = 1
One more question for you.
I wasn’t geting very good results on my DenseNet so I printed out my data. I am very suprised to see what get_data is doing.
My notebook code is as simple as :
val_data = get_data(path+'valid') plt.imshow(val_data)
And here is the get_data code
def get_batches_portrait(dirname, gen=image.ImageDataGenerator(), shuffle=False, batch_size=4, class_mode='categorical'): return gen.flow_from_directory(dirname, target_size=(540,270), class_mode=class_mode, shuffle=shuffle, batch_size=batch_size) def get_data(path): batches = get_batches_portrait(path, shuffle=False, batch_size=4, class_mode=None) return np.concatenate([batches.next() for i in range(batches.nb_sample)])
For some reason its taken my image and put some filter on it.
Any ideas what I might be missing?
Can you show the original image, to compare?
I would look at the maximum and minimum values of both images.
Images should generally be in [0,1] if float or [0,256) if int. And make sure no nans.
You also may have switched RGB order to BGR if you were using VGG, so if you did that make sure you also undo it when viewing the images. (img[…,::-1])
I created a separate folder and ran this code
def get_data(path): gen = image.ImageDataGenerator() batches = gen.flow_from_directory(path, target_size=(540,270), class_mode=None, shuffle=False, batch_size=2 ) result = np.concatenate([batches.next() for i in range(batches.nb_sample)]) print(result.shape) return result val_data = get_data(path+'imgflip')
plt.imshow(val_data) Shows the negative but
plt.imshow(val_data*255) shows the correct image. Even though if I printed val_data itself it shows values above 1
array([[[ 133., 131., 134.],
[ 127., 126., 131.],
[ 123., 124., 129.],
[ 113., 117., 126.],
[ 108., 115., 125.],
[ 99., 107., 118.],
[ 91., 101., 111.],
[ 88., 101., 110.],
[ 82., 95., 104.],
[ 76., 89., 98.],
[ 68., 78., 87.],
[ 60., 69., 74.],
I am going to train my model again on this muiltiplied number because I am not sure if the negative values will impact the model.
Let me know if you have any thoughts
You need to use
It’s just a plotting issue - unrelated to modeling.
This is exactly what happens in the dogscats-ensemble notebook when the function split_at is called
conv_layers,fc_layers = split_at(model, Convolution2D) In : conv_model = Sequential(conv_layers) conv_model.summary() ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Layer (type) Output Shape Param # Connected to ==================================================================================================== lambda_1 (Lambda) (None, 3, 224, 224) 0 lambda_input_1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ zeropadding2d_1 (ZeroPadding2D) (None, 3, 226, 226) 0 lambda_1 lambda_1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ convolution2d_1 (Convolution2D) (None, 64, 224, 224) 1792 zeropadding2d_1 zeropadding2d_1 __________
Yeah I noticed that too. It doesn’t seem to have any practical impact AFAICT.
I feel a little uncomfortable with these “connected to” layers especially if you run the same cells over and over again in your notebook it adds a new “connected to” each time. It may have unexpected side effects right now or in a future keras version. Therefore much better to use the copy_layer functions.
Two related issues I have come across:
- In the lessons we append a sequential model to another. But then when you list the layers the sequential layer appears as one layer so you cannot directly see what is in it. I think better to use copy_layers again so you can view the resulting model.
- If you save models and then read them back in; and then combine with layers from other models then sometimes you end up with layer name clashes. So you need functions to combine models that also forces unique layer names before compiling it.
If I want to split Resnet50 at what point is that feasible. The last layer being dense 1000 has to change for dogscats to dense 2. I am not sure where and how to cut it.
In Resnet50 we have 3 layers at the bottom AveragePooling2D -> Flatten -> Dense the final layer.
In previous splits with vgg16 we cut on the Flatten layer and then add BatchNormalization etc
Or simply just remove the last dense layer and replace with Dense(2,activation=‘softmax’)
When I do this I get an error when I want to see if the layer is there using model.summary() :: tried to call xxxx but layer isn’t built.
Not sure what that means with Resnet50 model
Ok I guess I just bumped up against the Functional API
def finetune(self, batches): model = self.model model.layers.pop() for layer in model.layers: layer.trainable=False m = Dense(batches.nb_class, activation='softmax')(model.layers[-1].output) self.model = Model(model.input, m) self.model.compile(optimizer=RMSprop(lr=0.1), loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
I finally have a model compiled using the lines from this function and modifying them for application directly against the model defined in my notebook. I could not call this function from the model Resnet50 I imported. Perhaps because I only imported that by name.
I can now see in my model summary that the output is a 2way softmax called output.
Hi, My name is Gertjan Brouwer and I am new to ML and AI and also to this forum.
I’m trying to learn AI by using fast.ai and the Keras documentation, I am currently following this tutorial: Keras tutorial .
The first training worked fine and I good about 80% accuracy with 2 hours of training. But now I wanted to use VGG16 and expand my training to 14 classes by using the second tutorial on that page.
I tried changing the binary_crossentropy to categorical_crossentropy but that did not work, I also changed the last dense layer from 1 to 14 but I keep getting this error: valueerror error when checking model expected shape (none, 10) but got array with shape(0, 44927)) . This is the code I am currently using: gist .
I also tried changed the training_samples and validation_samples from 2 to 44927 but that gave me the same error with different shapes, I still think the problem lies with this piece of code:
train_labels = np.array(  * (nb_train_samples / 2) +  * (nb_train_samples / 2)) validation_data = np.load(open('bottleneck_features_validation.npy')) validation_labels = np.array(  * (nb_validation_samples / 2) +  * (nb_validation_samples / 2))
Another problem might be that my 14 class training data is not evenly spread, I have classes with 6000 images and also classes with only a 1000 but I figured that would work fine because it worked on the first model too.
At this point I am unsure on what to try, I am willing to even change everything and follow an other tutorial if you guys can point me to one that uses image classification with the VGG16 model.