What?... It has the same stroke count (which is unusual, normally has fewer than traditional), but is the much more standard radical "rice" in the top-left (which is the only difference): simplified 数 vs traditional 數 . Anyways, please use whatever you prefer, but just figured I'd let you know.
Back on topic... Regarding @davecg's most useful caveat, you may want to look at this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00573 . It shows how you can think about and measure the level of truly novel image generation your network is doing. It's a bit heavy and theoretical in parts, but the key metrics and recommendations are actually fairly simple.